Bibliographic record
Abstract
Existing theories of gravity encompass Newton's law of universal gravitation and Einstein's general relativity; however, they fail to fully elucidate the nature of gravity and the mechanisms by which it influences the motion of objects. This article presents a new gravitational theory model proposed by the author, introducing the concept of gravitational line flux. By employing mathematical methods such as Gauss's theorem and Stokes's theorem, the study investigates how variations in gravitational flux through a closed spatial surface affect the motion of objects. The following laws are proposed: (1) The gravitational flux through a closed surface is directly proportional to the mass m of the enclosed celestial body. (2) Changes in gravitational flux through a semiclosed surface in the direction of an object's motion alter the object's motion state in space, while concurrently, the object's motion induces variations in the gravitational flux through the surface. (3) The time variation increment of gravitational flux through a semiclosed surface in the direction of the object's motion is proportional to the object's acceleration. Furthermore, the motion equations of gravitational fields for celestial bodies or matter in local inertial and noninertial frames are derived.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".