The Papal Bulls Dividing the Americas between Spain and Portugal: A Reappraisal
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The papacy recently repudiated the doctrine of discovery that was relied upon by European nations when they colonized lands inhabited by Indigenous peoples. However, the Vatican did not repeal the papal bulls that authorized and provided canon law support for colonization of West Africa and the Americas by Portugal and Spain. This article examines these bulls and questions the Pope’s legal authority to issue them. It contends that the bulls bound only the Christian monarchs who accepted the Pope’s authority in this regard. They had no legal force insofar as the Indigenous peoples were concerned. Moreover, the historical record reveals that other colonizing European powers, such as France and England, rejected the validity of the bulls. In fact, Spain and Portugal acquired their overseas empires in the fifteen and sixteenth centuries, not by means of discovery or papal bulls, but by subduing Indigenous peoples and forcibly occupying their territories.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it