Duration, course and caregiver burden of croup in children: two observational cohorts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Although croup is a common respiratory illness, there is little published regarding symptom course. We aimed to assess symptom progression and caregiver burden, and whether age, sex or season and initial severity of disease are associated with symptom duration. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: We conducted a secondary analysis of two Canadian prospective cohorts of children 0-16 years old diagnosed with croup; one recruited from a paediatric emergency department (ED) (307 children) between November 1999 and March 2000, and the other from 26 general EDs (1214 children) between September 2002 and April 2006. Baseline data included age, sex, season, corticosteroid treatment and clinical severity score based on the presence or absence of a barky cough, stridor at rest or with agitation and chest wall indrawing (mild, moderate or severe). For both cohorts, the child's primary caregiver was telephoned daily to collect symptom progression and psychosocial data (caregiver stress, lost sleep and work) until the child was symptom-free for over 24 hours. RESULTS: The paediatric and general ED cohorts are reported separately; croup symptoms peaked at initial ED presentation for 96% and 77%, respectively. The longest-lived symptom was a barky cough, resolving by 34 and 47 hours for 50%, and 78 and 119 hours for 90% of children, respectively. Neither sex nor severity at presentation were significantly associated with symptom duration in either cohort. Season of illness was associated in both; age was associated in the general but not the paediatric ED cohort. The primary caregiver lost a mean (SD) of 4.1 (4.9) and 2.8 (4.7) hours of sleep during the illness. CONCLUSIONS: Most children with croup presented for care at the peak of symptom severity. Symptoms resolved for half of the children in 1.5-2 days and for 90% in 3-5 days after presentation. Caregivers experienced a significant loss of sleep.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".