MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Efficacy, tolerability, and safety of xanomeline-trospium chloride for schizophrenia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2024· review· en· W4405773901 on OpenAlexafffund
Nicholas Fabiano, Stanley Wong, Carl Zhou, Christoph U. Correll, Mikkel Højlund, Marco Solmi

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSchizophrenia research and treatment
Canadian institutionsOttawa Public HealthOttawa HospitalUniversity of Ottawa
FundersJanssen CanadaH. Lundbeck A/SBoehringer Ingelheim
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineRelative riskAdverse effectStrictly standardized mean differenceMeta-analysisTolerabilityPositive and Negative Syndrome ScaleRandomized controlled trialPlaceboConfidence intervalGastroenterologyPsychiatryPsychosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The United States Food and Drug Administration approved xanomeline-trospium combination for schizophrenia on September-26-2024. We conducted a PRISMA 2020-compliant systematic review with random-effects meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety of xanomeline-trospium in randomized controlled trials in patients with schizophrenia (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, PsycINFO, October-01-2024). Co-primary outcomes were Positive And Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score (standardized mean difference=SMD), and all-cause discontinuation (risk ratio=RR). Cochrane's Risk of Bias (RoB) Tool 2 and GRADE were used. Xanomeline-trospium (k = 3, schizophrenia acute exacerbation, RoB=low, baseline N = 690, males=75.5 %, age=44.3 + 11.0, duration=5 weeks) outperformed placebo on PANSS total (SMD=-0.56, 95 % confidence interval/CI=-0.72/-0.40), positive (SMD=-0.59, 95 %CI=-0.75/-0.43), negative (SMD=-0.33, 95 %CI=-0.49/-0.17), and Marder Factor negative symptom score (SMD=-0.36, 95 %CI=-0.60/-0.13), Clinical Global Impression-Severity (SMD=-0.54, 95 %CI=-0.71/-0.37) (GRADE=moderate), and response (≥30 % reduction from baseline: RR=2.13, 95 %CI=1.66-2.75). Risk of ≥7 % weight gain (RR=0.46, 95 %CI=0.25-0.87, NNT=19), low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol levels were reduced, while risk was increased for vomiting, hypertension, nausea, dry mouth, dyspepsia, constipation (RR=7.60, 95 %CI=1.50-38.57 to RR=2.72, 95 %CI=1.63-4.55), any adverse event (RR=1.33, 95 %CI=1.18-1.51, NNT=6), triglyceride levels and supine heart rate (GRADE=moderate to high). Conversely, the risk was not increased for any other, serious, or severe adverse events or all-cause discontinuation. In post-hoc analyses, xanomeline-trospium outperformed placebo regarding response (≥20 % and ≥30 % threshold) starting at week 2, negative symptoms in patients with prominent negative symptoms, and cognitive symptoms in patients ≥1 standard deviation below the general population norm. Further, pro-/anti-cholinergic side effects were mild-moderate and mostly transient. Xanomeline-trospium is an effective treatment for schizophrenia with a unique tolerability profile, potentially addressing unmet needs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.018
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.051

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.018
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0180.032
Bibliometrics0.0050.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.083
GPT teacher head0.406
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations41
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean NeuropsychopharmacologySame topicSchizophrenia research and treatmentFrench-language works237,207