MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405778180 · doi:10.70391/7e4.3.a

Milada Paulová a její působení v mimouniverzitních vědeckých institucích

2020· article· en· W4405778180 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Daniela Brádlerová

Bibliographic record

VenueDějiny věd a techniky · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation, Psychology, and Social Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Research Council CanadaAkademie Věd České Republiky
KeywordsPolitical scienceTheologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Milada Paulová and her activity in non-university science institutions The article discusses the activities of the Czech historian and Byzantologist Milada Paulová in Czech non-university scientific institutions: the Royal Bohemian Society of Sciences (RBSS) and the Czech Academy of Sciences and Arts (CASA), the Czechoslovak National Research Council (CNRC) and the Slavic Institute (SI). The historian Milada Paulová was most active in her non-university career, after 1945, at Slavic Institute and Czechoslovak National Research Council.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.993
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.005
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0000.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.151
GPT teacher head0.453
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDějiny věd a technikySame topicEducation, Psychology, and Social ResearchFrench-language works237,207