Dual Strategy Based Improved Swarm Intelligence and Stacked LSTM With Residual Connection for Land Use Land Cover Classification
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Land use land cover (LULC) classification using satellite images is crucial for land-use inventories and environment modeling. The LULC classification is a difficult task because of the high dimensional feature space, which affects the classification accuracy. This article proposes a dual strategy-based bald eagle search (DSBES) algorithm and stacked long short-term memory (LSTM) with residual connection for LULC classification. The dual strategy includes adaptive inertia weight and phasor operator strategy to select relevant features from the feature subset. The stacked LSTM contains multiple layers stacked on top of each other to capture high-level temporal data. By integrating residual connection with stacked LSTM, gradient flow is enabled directly among long sequences, reducing the vanishing gradient issue and fastening the convergence rate. The DSBES and stacked LSTM with residual connection performance are examined in terms of metrics of accuracy, precision, sensitivity, specificity, f1-score, and computational time. The DSBES and stacked LSTM with residual connection achieve higher accuracy values of 99.71%, 98.66%, 97.59%, and 99.24% for UCM, AID, NWPU, and EuroSAT datasets, respectively, as compared to VGG19 and optimal guidance whale optimization algorithm–bidirectional long short-term memory.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".