EnzymeCAGE: A Geometric Foundation Model for Enzyme Retrieval with Evolutionary Insights
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Enzyme catalysis is fundamental to life, driving the chemical transformations that sustain biological processes and support industrial applications. However, unraveling the intertwined relationships between enzymes and their catalytic reactions remains a significant challenge. Here, we present EnzymeCAGE, a catalytic-specific geometric foundation model trained on approximately 1 million structure-informed enzyme-reaction pairs, spanning over 2,000 species and encompassing an extensive diversity of genomic and metabolic information. EnzymeCAGE features a geometry-aware multi-modal architecture coupled with an evolutionary information integration module, enabling it to effectively model the nuanced relationships between enzyme structure, catalytic function, and reaction specificity. EnzymeCAGE supports both experimental and predicted enzyme structures and is applicable across diverse enzyme families, accommodating a broad range of metabolites and reaction types. Extensive evaluations demonstrate EnzymeCAGE’s state-of-the-art performance in enzyme function prediction, reaction de-orphaning, catalytic site identification, and biosynthetic pathway reconstruction. These results highlight its potential as a transformative foundation model for understanding enzyme catalysis and accelerating the discovery of novel biocatalysts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".