Event-Based Visual/Inertial Odometry for UAV Indoor Navigation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Indoor navigation is becoming increasingly essential for multiple applications. It is complex and challenging due to dynamic scenes, limited space, and, more importantly, the unavailability of global navigation satellite system (GNSS) signals. Recently, new sensors have emerged, namely event cameras, which show great potential for indoor navigation due to their high dynamic range and low latency. In this study, an event-based visual–inertial odometry approach is proposed, emphasizing adaptive event accumulation and selective keyframe updates to reduce computational overhead. The proposed approach fuses events, standard frames, and inertial measurements for precise indoor navigation. Features are detected and tracked on the standard images. The events are accumulated into frames and used to track the features between the standard frames. Subsequently, the IMU measurements and the feature tracks are fused to continuously estimate the sensor states. The proposed approach is evaluated using both simulated and real-world datasets. Compared with the state-of-the-art U-SLAM algorithm, our approach achieves a substantial reduction in the mean positional error and RMSE in simulated environments, showing up to 50% and 47% reductions along the x- and y-axes, respectively. The approach achieves 5–10 ms latency per event batch and 10–20 ms for frame updates, demonstrating real-time performance on resource-constrained platforms. These results underscore the potential of our approach as a robust solution for real-world UAV indoor navigation scenarios.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".