Do the Provisional Paediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organisation Enthesitis/Spondylitis‐Related Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Criteria Capture Youth With Axial Spondyloarthritis?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The Paediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organisation (PRINTO) recently undertook an effort to better harmonize the pediatric and adult arthritis criteria. These provisional criteria are being refined for optimal performance. We aimed to investigate differences between patients who did and did not fulfill these PRINTO criteria among youth diagnosed with juvenile spondyloarthritis (SpA) that met axial juvenile SpA (axJSpA) classification criteria. METHODS: This was a retrospective cross-sectional sample of youth diagnosed with juvenile SpA who met the axJSpA classification criteria. Demographics, clinical manifestations, and physician and patient-reported outcomes were abstracted from medical records. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans underwent central imaging review by at least two central raters. Differences between groups were compared using Wilcoxon signed-rank test or chi-square test, as appropriate. RESULTS: Of 158 patients who met axJSpA criteria, 107 patients (68%) met the PRINTO provisional criteria for enthesitis/spondylitis-related arthritis. A total of 41 patients (26%) did not fulfill any of the three major PRINTO criteria due to lack of peripheral disease manifestations. Demographics, prevalence of inflammatory or structural lesions on MRI, family history of SpA, and duration of pain were not statistically different between those who did and did not meet PRINTO criteria. Those who fulfilled the PRINTO criteria had significantly more peripheral arthritis, enthesitis, and HLA-B27 positivity but reported less sacral/buttock pain. CONCLUSION: Phenotypic differences of children with axJSpA between those who were and were not classified by the PRINTO criteria were primarily due to peripheral disease manifestations and HLA-B27 positivity. Modification of the PRINTO provisional criteria may facilitate capture of youth with primarily axial disease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.034 | 0.116 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".