A jet-induced shock in a young, powerful radio galaxy at <i>z</i> = 3.00
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The bright radio source, GLEAM J091734 $-$ 001243 (hereafter GLEAM J0917 $-$ 0012), was previously selected as a candidate ultra-high redshift ( $z \gt 5$ ) radio galaxy due to its compact radio size and faint magnitude ( $K(\mathrm{AB})=22.7$ ). Its redshift was not conclusively determined from follow-up millimetre and near-infrared spectroscopy. Here we present new HST WFC3 G141 grism observations which reveal several emission lines including [NeIII] $\lambda$ 3867, [NeV] $\lambda$ 3426 and an extended ( $\approx 4.8\,$ kpc), [OII] $\lambda$ 3727 line which confirm a redshift of $3.004\pm0.001$ . The extended component of the [OII] $\lambda$ 3727 line is co-spatial with one of two components seen at 2.276 GHz in high resolution ( $60\times 20\,$ mas) Long Baseline Array data, reminiscent of the alignments seen in local compact radio galaxies. The BEAGLE stellar mass ( $\approx 2\times 10^{11}\,\textit{M}_\odot$ ) and radio luminosity ( $L_{\mathrm{500MHz}}\approx 10^{28}\,$ W Hz $^{-1}$ ) put GLEAM J0917 $-$ 0012 within the distribution of the brightest high-redshift radio galaxies at similar redshifts. However, it is more compact than all of them. Modelling of the radio jet demonstrates that this is a young, $\approx 50\,$ kyr old, but powerful, $\approx 10^{39}\,$ W, compact steep spectrum radio source. The weak constraint on the active galactic nucleus bolometric luminosity from the [NeV] $\lambda$ 3426 line combined with the modelled jet power tentatively implies a large black hole mass, $\ge 10^9\,\textit{M}_\odot$ , and a low, advection-dominated accretion rate, i.e. an Eddington ratio $\le 0.03$ . The [NeV] $\lambda$ 3426/[NeIII] $\lambda$ 3867 vs [OII] $\lambda$ 3727/[NeIII] $\lambda$ 3867 line ratios are most easily explained by radiative shock models with precursor photoionisation. Hence, we infer that the line emission is directly caused by the shocks from the jet and that this radio source is one of the youngest and most powerful known at cosmic noon. We speculate that the star-formation in GLEAM J0917 $-$ 0012 could be on its way to becoming quenched by the jet.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".