Optimal Integration of Hybrid FES-Exoskeleton for Precise Knee Trajectory Control
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper introduces a novel hybrid torque allocation method for improving wearability and mobility in integrated functional electrical stimulation (FES) of the quadriceps muscles and powered exoskeleton systems. Our proposed approach leverages a hierarchical closed-loop controller for knee joint position tracking while addressing limitations of powered exoskeletons and FES systems by reducing power consumption and battery size and by mitigating FES-induced muscle fatigue, respectively. The core component is a model-free optimization algorithm that dynamically distributes torque between FES and the exoskeleton by considering tracking error, effort, and the prediction of muscle fatigue in the cost function, computing allocation gain in an online manner. The online optimization approach interactively changes the optimal allocation gain by taking into account the instantaneous value of error and effort and also penalizing FES-induced fatigue, a common challenge in long-duration experiments. The results demonstrate that this dynamic allocation significantly improves system wearability by reducing power consumption without increasing muscle fatigue during the extension phase of walking. This hybrid control approach contributes to improving exoskeleton wearability and rehabilitation outcomes for individuals with SCI and mobility impairments, enhancing assistive technology and quality of life.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".