MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405799030 · doi:10.53479/38817

Banco de España Business Activity Survey: 2024 Q4

2024· article· en· W4405799030 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Alejandro Fernández Cerezo, Mario Izquierdo

Bibliographic record

VenueEconomic Bulletin · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicEmployment and Welfare Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRespondentQuarter (Canadian coin)Economic shortageBusinessTurnoverSample (material)Labour economicsEconomicsFinanceGovernment (linguistics)Management

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rationale The Banco de España Business Activity Survey (EBAE) provides highly valuable, real-time information on a broad sample of Spanish firms’ turnover, employment, costs and prices. This helps to diagnose current economic developments. Takeaways •Firms perceive an increase in turnover in 2024 Q4, compared with the decreases in the same quarter of 2022 and 2023. Those located in the Valencia region have reported adverse turnover developments as a result of the impact of the flash floods. •Inflationary pressures have ticked up slightly in Q4, in both the cost of inputs and selling prices. •The percentage of firms affected by higher borrowing costs and insufficient demand has fallen, but economic policy uncertainty and labour shortages remain high. •In a module on advanced technologies, 3% of respondent firms reported a high or moderate use of artificial intelligence (AI) systems and 11% are experimenting with them. For firms not yet using AI, the main barriers are a lack of skilled staff, prohibitive costs and significant uncertainty about the legal ramifications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.226
Threshold uncertainty score0.986

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.018

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.378
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEconomic BulletinSame topicEmployment and Welfare StudiesFrench-language works237,207