DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT TRENDS IN AGRICULTURE
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ensuring sustainable rates of Russian agriculture development requires significant investment, which is due to the introduction of digital technologies in the industry. The solution to this issue in practice is impossible without the implementation of federal projects and programs by the state. In recent years, certain trends in increasing production volumes have been achieved in the agricultural sector of Russia, which is also positively influenced by the digital solutions introduced into agriculture. Technologies with a quick payback have become especially popular among farmers of our country: fuel and lubricant consumption monitoring sensors; cloud solutions, the main purpose of which is forecasting, accounting, planning; digital solutions for agricultural enterprises with an industrial type of production; and the least - technologies related to forecasting or modeling due to their longer payback. By 2022, there is a decrease in the gap in the indicators characterizing the availability of websites, use of internet, computer networks in agricultural formations and the average values for all organizations in the country. The development and implementation of digital technologies in agricultural production requires the use of an integrated approach that would include the interaction of the state and business in the industry in order to achieve higher indicators. At the same time, we must not forget about legal support, and it is also necessary to improve the technological, organizational, financial, personnel components in solving the problem under consideration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it