MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405805162 · doi:10.1016/j.compag.2024.109864

Pest-PVT: A model for multi-class and dense pest detection and counting in field-scale environments

2024· article· en· W4405805162 on OpenAlexaff
Hongrui Chen, Changji Wen, Long Zhang, Zhenyu Ma, Tianyu Liu, Guangyao Wang, Helong Yu, Ce Yang, Xiaohui Yuan, Junfeng Ren

Bibliographic record

VenueComputers and Electronics in Agriculture · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSmart Agriculture and AI
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Education and Child Care
FundersEducation Department of Jilin ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsPEST analysisScale (ratio)Field (mathematics)Environmental scienceScale modelEngineeringMathematicsBiologyGeographyCartographyAerospace engineeringBotany

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Field-scale pest monitoring is crucial for evaluating insect infestations in agricultural environments. The Pest24 dataset presents unique challenges due to the small pest target sizes, high target similarity, and dense pest distribution. To address these challenges, we propose Pest-PVT, a comprehensive framework based on the Pyramid Vision Transformer v2 (PVTv2) network model. Pest-PVT adopts an anchor-free approach using Fully Convolutional One-Stage Object Detection (FCOS) to enhance small object detection and incorporates Adaptive Training Sample Selection (ATSS) to mitigate sample imbalance bias. Dynamic Heads (DyHead) are employed to handle pests of varying scales and spatial changes, while Shunted Self-Attention (SSA) enhances multi-scale feature capture and reduces memory consumption. Compared to 23 other mainstream detection models and previously published works, our proposed Pest-PVT outperforms state-of-the-art detectors on pest detection datasets, achieving the outperformed scores in detection evaluation metrics such as mAP, Precision, Recall, and F1-Score, reaching 77.2 %, 78.42 %, 81.27 %, and 0.80, respectively. With a parameter size of only 24.74 M, Pest-PVT is suitable for integration into edge devices with limited resources. This work represents a significant contribution to the field of field-scale pest monitoring and addresses the specific challenges posed by the Pest24 dataset. Our code is made available at https://github.com/jlauwcj/pest-pvt .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.845
Threshold uncertainty score0.416

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations37
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueComputers and Electronics in AgricultureSame topicSmart Agriculture and AIFrench-language works237,207