MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405809346 · doi:10.18280/ijdne.190634

Potential of Cocoa Derived-Endophytic Fungi in the Biocontrol of Phytophthora Palmivora

2024· article· en· W4405809346 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ratnawati Ratnawati, Arfan Arfan, Kasman Jaya, Annisa Annisa

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicCocoa and Sweet Potato Agronomy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhytophthora palmivoraBiological pest controlPhytophthoraBiologyBotany

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.) is an important commodity traded worldwide.Commonly cocoa is susceptible to various diseases that reduce its productivity.One of the important diseases affecting cocoa plants is fruit rot caused by Phytophthora palmivora.The study purpose is to explore endophytic fungi in the soil rhizosphere of cocoa plantations and investigate their existence as the potential biocontrol against fruit rot pathogen P. palmivora from different areas.Rhizosphere soil contains endophytic fungi collected from the rhizosphere soil of cocoa plants in Palolo and Labuan, Central Sulawesi, Indonesia.The microbes were successfully isolated.The samples were grouped based on their respective sampling areas.The laboratory test from rhizosphere samples from different areas used dual culture and volatile compound tests.Isolation results from the two areas obtained eight isolates from Palolo identified as: Penicillium (1), Gliocladium (2), Trichoderma (2), Aspergillus (2) and unidentified (1).Six isolates from Labuan identified isolates as Trichoderma (4) and Aspergillus (2).The results obtained in the dual culture test presenting the highest inhibitor for P. palmivora are isolate T1RP3 (78.46%).In the tests, isolate T1RP3 showed the highest inhibition against P. palmivora at 78.46% in the dual culture test, while isolate T5RL3 achieved the highest inhibition at 42.19% in the volatile compound test.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.843
Threshold uncertainty score0.133

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Design & Nature and EcodynamicsSame topicCocoa and Sweet Potato AgronomyFrench-language works237,207