MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405812396 · doi:10.1109/lcomm.2024.3523421

Optimal Service Placement for 6G Edge Computing With Quantum-Centric Optimization in Real Quantum Hardware

2024· article· en· W4405812396 on OpenAlexafffund
Dang Van Huynh, Octavia A. Dobre, Trung Q. Duong

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Communications Letters · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicQuantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersCanada Excellence Research Chairs, Government of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceQuantum computerEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionQuantumService (business)Computer hardwareComputer networkComputer architectureTelecommunicationsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mobile edge computing (MEC) is emerging as a transformative enabler for the sixth-generation (6G) wireless networks. This letter investigates the potential of a quantum-centric optimisation approach for service placement in 6G MEC. Specifically, we formulate a mixed-integer binary programming problem that aims to minimise both service costs and delay by optimising service placement decisions, subject to constraints on service availability and the computing budget of edge servers. The formulated problem is NP-hard, making it computationally challenging for classical methods to solve. To address this, we develop a quantum-centric optimisation solution that efficiently finds optimal binary solutions for the problem, demonstrating potential for tackling medium-to-large-scale instances. Simulation results validate the effectiveness of the quantum-centric approach by showcasing the convergence pattern of the optimisation process on real quantum hardware and the associated increase in running time compared to a classical method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.457
Threshold uncertainty score0.985

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Communications LettersSame topicQuantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureFrench-language works237,207