On Non/Permeable Boundaries: Borderscape Reading of McCann’s <i>Apeirogon</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper argues that the debordering process represented in McCann’s Apeirogon (2020) is predominantly Zionist, resulting in enticing violent practices against the Palestinians. The de facto colonial state of Israel invites multilayered conceptualizations of borders, some of which are depicted in McCann’s novel. Apeirogon reimagines porous and permeable Palestinian/Israeli symbolic and physical borders instead of the commonly perceived rigid ones. By envisioning porous Palestinian/Israeli borders, Apeirogon advocates for an interstitial state transcending different religious, political, and ideological schisms between both parties; however, does it suit the contextuality of colonized Palestine? Reading the novel through the lens of Border Theory, with its interrelated politics of in/visibility and in/exclusion, my premise is to analyze the extent to which Apeirogon renders a violent debordering process mandatory for the security of Israelis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".