MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Compressive, shear, and tensile behaviours of concrete masonry: Experimental and numerical study

2024· article· en· W4405827868 on OpenAlexaff
Abdulelah Al-Ahdal, Belal AbdelRahman, Khaled Galal

Bibliographic record

VenueConstruction and Building Materials · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMasonry and Concrete Structural Analysis
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMasonryMaterials scienceUltimate tensile strengthShear (geology)Structural engineeringCompressive strengthComposite materialGeotechnical engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The heterogeneous behaviour of masonry structures arises from the use of materials with different mechanical properties, namely blocks, mortar, grout, and reinforcement. This complexity makes predicting the behaviour of reinforced masonry (RM) challenging. While experimental studies in the literature have focused on the ultimate compression load and strain capacities of masonry prisms, there is still a lack of experimental data on the compressive, shear and tensile behaviours of concrete masonry prisms built with different configurations. A thorough understanding of the complete compressive, shear, and tensile stress-strain curves of fully grouted and ungrouted web and C-shaped boundary element assemblages is vital for assessing the response of reinforced masonry shear walls (RMSWs) under lateral forces. Therefore, this study investigates the mechanical properties of concrete masonry assemblages under axial compression, shear, and tension experimentally and numerically. Eighty-four concrete masonry prisms were constructed either from stretcher or C-shaped masonry units, and were tested under compression, shear or tension loading. The experimental results provide full stress-strain curves, revealing that ungrouted prisms exhibit higher peak compressive stress but lower shear and tensile strengths compared to their grouted counterparts. Stretcher ungrouted prisms showed a reduction of more than 50 % in shear strength compared to their grouted counterparts. Grouted boundary element prisms demonstrated higher tensile strength and fracture energy, with increases of 40 % and 10 %, respectively, compared to the stretcher grouted prisms. Lastly, a numerical investigation was conducted to validate detailed and simplified micro-models against the experimental results, which demonstrated that the numerical results are in good agreement with the experimental outputs of this study. • Masonry behavior varies due to different properties of its constituent materials. • Study investigates axial compression, shear, and tension on masonry assemblages. • Ungrouted prisms show higher peak compressive stress but lower shear/tensile strength. • Grouted boundary element prisms have 40 % higher tensile strength than stretcher prisms. • Numerical models validated with experiments show good agreement with results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueConstruction and Building MaterialsSame topicMasonry and Concrete Structural AnalysisFrench-language works237,207