MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405832749 · doi:10.69704/jhaesi.116.2004.468

Tel Ḥaẓor – 2006

2007· article· en· W4405832749 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueḤadašŵt ʾarkeyŵlŵgiyŵt. · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArchaeology and Historical Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During July-August 2006 the seventeenth season of excavation at Tel Hazor was scheduled to take place. Due to the war breaking out in the north the excavation was curtailed after two weeks (License No. G-16/2006). In September, fieldwork was completed in Area A-5 and several conservation measures were implemented before the beginning of the rainy season. The 'Selz Foundation Excavations at Hazor in Memory of Yigael Yadin', on behalf of the Hebrew University and under the auspices of the Israel Exploration Society, were conducted by an expedition headed by A. Ben-Tor that included D. Ben-Ami (supervision Area A-4), S. Kisilevitz (supervision Area A-2), D. Zigler and V. Avrutis (supervision Area A-5), S. Zuckerman, A. Davidovich and B. Drake (supervision Area M), J. Rosenberg (surveying), O. Cohen and I. Strand (conservation), M. Cimadevilla (photography), A. Madvig-Struer (office and find registration) and S. Yadid and I. Strand (administration). Students and volunteers from several countries participated in the excavation, among them a group from the Associates for Biblical Research from the United States (led by G. Franz), a group of students from Romania (led by T. Aldea), as well as volunteers from the United States, Canada and Europe and archaeology students from the Hebrew University in Jerusalem.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.363
Threshold uncertainty score0.909

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3630.150

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueḤadašŵt ʾarkeyŵlŵgiyŵt.Same topicArchaeology and Historical StudiesFrench-language works237,207