Bibliographic record
Abstract
During June 2006, a fourth season of excavations was conducted in the Late Roman fort at Yotvata (License No. G-2/2006; map ref. NIG 2043/4217; OIG 1543/9217). The excavation was directed by G. Davies, on behalf of Florida International University and J. Magness, on behalf of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and was funded by the Elot Regional Council, with special thanks to D. Banet, the Toronto Jewish Community and the Foundation for Biblical Archaeology (Sheila Bishop). The excavation staff included R. Darby, C. Duncan, C. Fenwick, D. Nelson, A. Ratzlaff (area supervision), J.S. Bucko (surveying), A. Zadok (administration), J. Haberman (photography), E. Stegmaier (drawing), N. Elkins (numismatics) and M. Robinson-Mohr (registration). It is with great regret that we report the untimely passing of D. Nelson in June 2006. We are grateful to the Elot Regional Council and Qibbuz Lotan for their support and assistance at that difficult time.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".