MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405836624 · doi:10.1016/j.ecmx.2024.100860

K-means and agglomerative clustering for source-load mapping in distributed district heating planning

2024· article· en· W4405836624 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy Conversion and Management X · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIntegrated Energy Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaEnergimyndigheten
KeywordsHierarchical clusteringCluster analysisComputer scienceData miningArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• Data-driven clustering optimizes heat source placement in Stockholm's district heating network. • Distributed sources supply 54% of annual heat demand (7.7 TWh/year) from data centers, water bodies, and supermarkets. • Marginal heat costs (12.7–20 EUR/MWh) are below market prices, confirming economic feasibility. • Scalable framework offers sustainable solutions for district heating in global urban contexts. • Findings guide policy for cost-effective, low-carbon energy systems. This study introduces a high-resolution, data-driven approach for optimizing district heating networks using source-load mapping, focusing on Stockholm as a case study. The methodology integrates detailed building energy performance data (2014–2022) with geographic data from the Swedish Survey Agency, employing advanced clustering techniques such as K-means Clustering, Agglomerative Clustering, DBSCAN, Spectral Clustering, and Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM) Clustering to identify optimal locations for distributed heat sources, including data centers, supermarkets, and water bodies. Quantitative results show that these environmentally friendly sources could supply 54 % of Stockholm’s total annual heat demand of 7.7 TWh/year, equating to 4.2 TWh from residual heat sources. Data centers contribute 0.48 TWh, water bodies provide 3.4 TWh, and supermarkets contribute 0.3 TWh annually. Economic analysis further reveals that 98 % of residual heat sources are economically viable, with marginal costs of heat (MCOH) for data centers, supermarkets, and water bodies estimated at 12.7 EUR/MWh, 16.0 EUR/MWh, and 20.0 EUR/MWh, respectively—well below the Open District Heating (ODH) market price of 22.0 EUR/MWh. The policy implications of these findings are profound. Policymakers can leverage this methodology to identify economically viable heat sources, enabling the creation of regulations that incentivize the integration of distributed heat sources into existing district heating networks. This can lead to reduced energy costs, enhanced sustainability, and more resilient energy systems. Practically, urban planners and energy utilities can use clustering insights to optimize the placement of new infrastructure, such as data centers, ensuring they are strategically located in high-demand zones. Furthermore, the study’s methodology can be replicated in other urban contexts, offering cities worldwide a scalable tool for improving the efficiency and sustainability of their heating networks. These findings support the transition to low-carbon energy solutions and provide actionable recommendations for the long-term development of urban energy systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.983
Threshold uncertainty score0.577

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it