MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405837245

Biography of Joaquín Marcos Satrustegui Bris (Donostia-San Sebastián 1817- 1885), a mediator in the Bergara agreement, diplomatic and contrary to foral abolition in 1876

2012· article· en· W4405837245 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicBasque language and culture studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiographyHumanitiesPolitical scienceArtLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Exiled in England, liberal militiaman in San Sebastian, attaché at the headquarters of the Commander of the British Legion, interpreter for the British delegation during the first Carlist civil war and agent during the negotiations of the Treaty of Bergara to end the war in the Basque Country. He was in favour of Foral Basque Constitution. Merchant and partner in the firm E. Mickle and Company (1850) in San Francisco (California) He was appointed Consul of Spain for San Francisco on 2/6/1851 and later Consul of Parma for the State of California.(1853). From 1864 onwards he became a professional diplomat, serving as Spanish Consul in Newcastle, Algiers, Montreal, New York and London. He received the “title of the realm” Baron de Satrustegui in 1876. J.M. Satrustegui was, also, an other archetypal Basque emigrant: He had a solid professional training, took part in different business enterprises and became a functionary of the bureaucratic structure of the Spanish nation-state, following the path of the liberal group and lobby from San Sebastian. Founding partner of the Lopez y Cia shipping company (1857).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.063

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.165
GPT teacher head0.547
Teacher spread0.382 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)Same topicBasque language and culture studiesFrench-language works237,207