TempCharBERT: Keystroke Dynamics for Continuous Access Control Based on Pre-trained Language Models
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the widespread of digital environments, reliable authentication and continuous access control has become crucial. It can minimize cyber attacks and prevent frauds, specially those associated with identity theft. A particular interest lies on keystroke dynamics (KD), which refers to the task of recognizing individuals’ identity based on their unique typing style. In this work, we propose the use of pre-trained language models (PLMs) to recognize such patterns. Although PLMs have shown high performance on multiple NLP benchmarks, the use of these models on specific tasks requires customization. BERT and RoBERTa, for instance, rely on subword tokenization, and they cannot be directly applied to KD, which requires temporalcharacter information to recognize users. Recent character-aware PLMs are able to process both subwords and character-level information and can be an alternative solution. Notwithstanding, they are still not suitable to be directly fine-tuned for KD as they are not optimized to account for user’s temporal typing information (e.g., hold time and flight time). To overcome this limitation, we propose TempCharBERT, an architecture that incorporates temporal-character information in the embedding layer of CharBERT. This allows modeling keystroke dynamics for the purpose of user identification and authentication. Our results show a significant improvement with this customization. We also showed the feasibility of training TempCharBERT on a federated learning settings in order to foster data privacy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".