MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405848729 · doi:10.6000/1929-6029.2024.13.38

Statistical Analysis of Microarray Data to Identify Key Gene Expression Patterns in Primary Hyperoxaluria

2024· article· en· W4405848729 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Usha Adiga, Brij Kishore, Adam A. Augustine, Sampara Vasishta

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Statistics in Medical Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicKidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicroarray analysis techniquesKey (lock)Computational biologyExpression (computer science)Data miningComputer scienceGene expressionBiologyGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study aims to utilize microarray data deposited by Romero et al. and conduct bioinformatic analysis for identifying differentially expressed genes (DEGs) associated with a novel method involving gene correction at the Alanine–Glyoxylate Aminotransferase (AGXT) locus and direct conversion of fibroblasts from primary hyperoxaluria type 1 (PH1) patients into healthy induced hepatocytes (iHeps) using Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats - CRISPR-associated protein 9 (CRISPR-Cas9) technology. Additionally, the study aims to elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying hyperoxaluria compared to oxalate crystal formation. Romero et al.'s GSE226019 microarray data was retrieved from Gene Expression Omnibus. Statistical analysis was done in R and Bioconductor, utilizing rigorous methods to ensure robust and reproducible results. The limma program compared gene expression levels across groups. Pathway analysis, protein-protein interaction (PPI) network creation, and miRNA-target interaction network analysis were constructed. The top ten DEGs included ANGPTL3, SLC38A3, KNG1, BDH1, GC, ADH1C, ARG1, CYP3A4, AMBP, and CYP2C9. Enrichment analysis revealed significant associations with various biological pathways, including Linoleic acid metabolism and Retinol metabolism. Volcano plots and mean difference plots highlighted significant gene expression changes between different sample groups. Protein-protein interaction networks and miRNA-target interaction networks provided insights into molecular interactions and regulatory mechanisms. The top ten differentially expressed genes include ANGPTL3, SLC38A3, KNG1, BDH1, GC, ADH1C, ARG1, CYP3A4, AMBP, and CYP2C9—emerge as key players with strong associations to critical biological pathways like Linoleic acid metabolism and drug metabolism-cytochrome P450. Understanding the regulatory role of specific miRNAs (hsa-miR-4501, hsa-miR-5692c, hsa-miR-6731-3p, hsa-miR-6867-5p, hsa-miR-616-3p, hsa-miR-4468, hsa-miR-3692-3p, hsa-miR-4277, hsa-miR-4763-5p, hsa-miR-4797-5p) in gene expression could provide further insights into disease mechanisms and potential therapeutic avenues. The statistical findings provide a foundation for predictive modeling, hypothesis testing, and exploring personalized therapeutic strategies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.041

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.110
GPT teacher head0.508
Teacher spread0.398 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Statistics in Medical ResearchSame topicKidney Stones and Urolithiasis TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207