MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405848788 · doi:10.6000/1929-6029.2024.13.35

Leptin Signaling: Decoding of Genetic Pathways using Bioinformatics; Shaping Bariatric Surgery Outcomes

2024· article· en· W4405848788 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Usha Adiga, Sampara Vasishta, Adam A. Augustine

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Statistics in Medical Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiet and metabolism studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLeptinBioinformaticsDecoding methodsMedicineObesityBiologyComputational biologyGeneticsComputer scienceInternal medicineAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Leptin, a hormone central to energy homeostasis and appetite regulation, plays a pivotal role in obesity and metabolic health. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the leptin (LEP) and leptin receptor (LEPR) genes influence leptin signaling and may explain variability in outcomes following bariatric surgery. This bioinformatics-driven study examines the role of LEP and LEPR SNPs in modulating weight loss, metabolic changes, and hormonal responses post-surgery. Methods: A total of 55 leptin SNPs and 216 leptin receptor SNPs were assessed for functional impact using SIFT, PolyPhen-2, and Mutation Assessor. Pathway enrichment analyses using DAVID and g:Profiler identified biological processes and signaling pathways linked to leptin function. Protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks were constructed via STRING and visualized in Cytoscape to explore molecular interactions. Statistical models evaluated associations between SNPs and surgical outcomes, including weight loss and metabolic improvements. Key pathways with false discovery rates (FDR) < 0.01 were highlighted to emphasize significance. Results: Bioinformatics analyses revealed LEP and LEPR as critical variants associated with bariatric surgery outcomes. Specifically, LEP rs7799039 G allele carriers exhibited diminished weight loss (p < 0.05) and metabolic improvements. Functional prediction tools consistently indicated deleterious effects on leptin signaling. Pathway enrichment analyses identified leptin's involvement in critical pathways, including the adipocytokine signaling pathway (hsa04920, 2 of 68 genes, strength = 2.46, FDR = 0.0042)," "AMPK signaling pathway (hsa04152, 2 of 120 genes, strength = 2.22, FDR = 0.0064)," and "non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) pathway (hsa04932, 2 of 146 genes, strength = 2.13, FDR = 0.0064). PPI networks underscored leptin’s interactions with key metabolic and inflammatory regulators, such as TNF-α and IL-6, suggesting a broader impact on energy metabolism and inflammation. Conclusion: This study demonstrates the utility of bioinformatics in elucidating the genetic basis of variable bariatric surgery outcomes. LEP and LEPR SNPs modulate critical pathways influencing weight loss and metabolic responses. Integrating genetic insights with bariatric care could advance precision medicine approaches for obesity management. Future studies with larger cohorts are warranted to confirm these findings and strengthen predictive models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.212
GPT teacher head0.466
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Statistics in Medical ResearchSame topicDiet and metabolism studiesFrench-language works237,207