MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405859021 · doi:10.31902/fll.49.2024.3

EXILE AND LOSS IN DAVID ALBAHARI’S NOVEL BAIT

2024· article· en· W4405859021 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Miljana Lj. Lj. Đorović

Bibliographic record

VenueFolia linguistica et litteraria · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPostcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The main character in David Albahari’s novel Bait leaves Serbia and flees to Canada where he tries to start his life anew. The narrator finds himself alone and lonely, sad, troubled and completely estranged from his new surroundings, language, culture and people. The paper will primarily rely on Edward Said (2001) and Svetlana Boym’s (2001) definitions and meanings of exile in which they both recognize loss as its fundamental element. This paper aims to show the complexity of loss following exile and the ways to constructively overcome it. The narrator’s life in the novel is filled with different losses – that of his home country, language, his people, identity and sense of belonging. Despite all the promises of a better life that Canada seems to offer to the novel’s narrator, Albahari portrays him as a man who is suffering and desperately trying to adapt to everything that Canada represents. The paper will focus on how the narrator navigates his alienation and attempts to forge a new identity in a new country whilst enduring the sadness and estrangement of his self-imposed exile. Keywords: Albahari, exile, loss, country, language, estrangement, identity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.064
Threshold uncertainty score0.127

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0120.010
Scholarly communication0.0050.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFolia linguistica et litterariaSame topicPostcolonial and Cultural Literary StudiesFrench-language works237,207