MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405859888 · doi:10.5376/msb.2024.15.0016

Enhancing Nitrogen Use Efficiency in Rice for Sustainable Agriculture

2024· article· en· W4405859888 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Soil Biology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicRice Cultivation and Yield Improvement
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRhizosphereDryland farmingEnvironmental scienceAgronomyAgricultureAgricultural engineeringAgroforestryBiologyEcologyEngineeringBacteria

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The primary goal of this study is to enhance nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) in rice ( Oryza sativa L.) to promote sustainable agricultural practices. This involves reducing the dependency on nitrogen fertilizers while maintaining or improving rice productivity and minimizing environmental impacts. Key discoveries include the identification of genetic and agronomic strategies to improve NUE. Genetic approaches, such as the manipulation of NIN-like proteins (OsNLP1 and OsNLP3), have shown promise in enhancing NUE and grain yield under varying nitrogen conditions. Additionally, site-specific nutrient management (SSNM) and digital decision support tools like Rice Crop Manager have been effective in optimizing nitrogen application, thereby improving NUE and reducing environmental pollution. The integration of conventional breeding, molecular genetics, and alternative farming techniques has also been highlighted as essential for achieving sustainable improvements in NUE. The findings underscore the importance of a multifaceted approach combining genetic, agronomic, and technological innovations to enhance nitrogen use efficiency in rice. These strategies not only improve rice productivity but also contribute to environmental sustainability by reducing nitrogen losses and pollution. Future research should focus on refining these approaches and promoting their adoption among farmers to achieve long-term sustainability in rice production.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.216
Threshold uncertainty score0.185

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular Soil BiologySame topicRice Cultivation and Yield ImprovementFrench-language works237,207