MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405864894 · doi:10.1007/s42114-024-01196-8

Digital light processing 3D printing of dual crosslinked meniscal scaffolds with enhanced physical and biological properties

2024· article· en· W4405864894 on OpenAlex
Abhay Menon, Kamil Elkhoury, Amer Zahraa, Jiranuwat Sapudom, Zerina Rahic, Kristin C. Gunsalus, Jeremy Teo, Nïkhil Gupta, Sanjairaj Vijayavenkataraman

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced Composites and Hybrid Materials · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicKnee injuries and reconstruction techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersYork UniversityNew York University Abu Dhabi
KeywordsScaffoldSelf-healing hydrogelsBiomedical engineeringGelatinTissue engineeringMaterials scienceRegenerative medicineMesenchymal stem cellRegeneration (biology)BiomaterialMeniscusChondrogenesisChemistryNanotechnologyCell biologyCellPolymer chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Regenerating damaged meniscal tissue remains a significant challenge due to the meniscus’ limited capacity for self-repair. Photocrosslinkable hydrogels, like gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA), offer a promising solution for meniscal regeneration by providing structural flexibility to accommodate the meniscus’ complex geometry while enabling the incorporation of bioactive molecules and cells. However, GelMA alone often lacks the mechanical robustness required for load-bearing applications. In this study, we introduce a dual-crosslinked GelMA scaffold, enhanced with tannic acid (TA), designed to replicate the mechanical properties of the native meniscus. By adjusting TA concentrations, we successfully fine-tuned the scaffold’s compressive modulus to match that of human meniscal tissue. This dual crosslinking not only improved mechanical strength but also resulted in a denser matrix with smaller pore sizes and reduced degradation and swelling rates. The optimized GelMA-TA formulation was 3D-printed into complex shapes, demonstrating its potential for producing patient-specific scaffolds. Beyond its mechanical benefits, the GelMA-TA scaffold exhibited excellent antioxidant and antibacterial properties. Human mesenchymal stem cells seeded onto the scaffold showed high viability, increased proliferation, and successful chondrogenic differentiation. Additionally, the GelMA-TA scaffold acted as an immunomodulatory biomaterial, suppressing pro-inflammatory responses in monocytes while promoting an anti-inflammatory, pro-regenerative M2a macrophage phenotype. These findings suggest that the GelMA-TA scaffold holds strong potential as a viable solution for meniscal tissue repair, offering both structural integrity and enhanced biological functionality. Graphical abstract

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.050
Threshold uncertainty score0.377

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it