MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405882573 · doi:10.1177/2473011424s00361

Midterm Outcomes of Transfibular Total Ankle Arthroplasty: Clinical and Radiographic Analysis of 130 Cases with Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up

2024· article· en· W4405882573 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jonathan Day, Amanda N. Fletcher, Morgan Motsay, Maggie K. Manchester, Mark Arthur, Zijun Zhang, Lew C. Schon

Bibliographic record

VenueFoot & Ankle Orthopaedics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFoot and Ankle Surgery
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRadiographyAnkleAnkle replacementCoronal planePeriprostheticVisual analogue scaleImplantRange of motionOrthopedic surgeryProsthesisPerioperativeArthroplastySagittal planeDeformityOsteoarthritisPatient satisfactionSurgeryPromRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Category: Ankle Arthritis; Ankle Introduction/Purpose: The current fourth generation of total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) continues to build upon previous advances in implant design. In contrast to these implants, which utilize a traditional anterior approach for implantation, the Zimmer Trabecular Metal Total Ankle (Zimmer-Biomet, Warsaw, IN) is unique in that it utilizes a transfibular approach to the ankle. This allows for a shallow resection depth, and the insertion of a curved prosthesis design, mimicking the native tibiotalar joint. While previous case-series have reported on implant survivorship, a comprehensive midterm study of the clinical and radiographic outcomes of this system is limited. Here we present the largest midterm study to date by a single-surgeon, and analyze the survivorship, clinical, and radiographic outcomes of the transfibular TAA at a minimum of 5-years follow-up. Methods: Retrospective review was performed on prospectively followed patients who underwent primary transfibular TAA by a single surgeon from October 2012 to December 2018. Inclusion criteria included: minimum 5-years of follow-up. patient-reported outcomes measures (PROM), and radiographic follow-up. Patient demographics and perioperative data were collected. PROMs included: 12-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) physical (PCS) and mental (MCS) component scores, Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale (OAS), and Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Functional outcomes included range of motion (ROM) measured on weightbearing ROM radiographs. Radiographic outcomes included coronal and sagittal alignment, and evaluation of periprosthetic lucency utilizing a 12-zone system. Adverse events and reoperations were reported using the Canadian Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (COFAS) Reoperation Coding System (CROCS). A total of 130 ankles (122 patients) with average follow-up of 5.9 years (range, 5.0-10.1) were included in the study. The average age was 60.8 years-old, with 50.8% being females. Results: Postoperative PROMs included SF-12 PCS: 41.5; SF-12 MCS: 54.9; VAS: 2.3; AOS Pain: 19.1; AOS Disability: 28.5. Postoperative tibiopedal ROM was 17.7° dorsiflexion and 21.8° plantarflexion. Postoperative tibiotalar ROM was 7.4° dorsiflexion and 17.3° plantarflexion. A total of 26 (20%) ankles had a single zone of lucency, while 7 (5.4%) ankles had 6 or more; none had more than 7 zones. There were no cases of cysts, subsidence, septic/aseptic loosening, or fibular non-union. Reoperation rate was 36.2% (n=47) at average 26.7 months, most commonly removal of fibula hardware (n=28, 21.5%), medial gutter debridement (n=18, 13.8%). There were 5 (3.8%) cases of acute infection treated with I&D and metal component retention. Overall implant survival, defined by retention of the metal components, was 100%. Conclusion: Transfibular TAA is an effective durable treatment option for end-stage ankle arthritis with excellent implant survivorship, providing sustained improvements in clinical and radiographic outcomes at the midterm. Reoperations were mostly elective removal of fibular hardware or medial impingement. There was 100% retention of the metal components. Deformity correction was achieved and maintained. The majority of ankles had no radiographic lucencies and only 20% had a single zone out of 12 zones which did not correlate with clinical outcomes. There were no cysts, subsidence, or fibular non-unions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFoot & Ankle OrthopaedicsSame topicFoot and Ankle SurgeryFrench-language works237,207