Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Analysis of Information and Communication Technology Using VIKOR
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The utilization of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) has greatly enhanced various sectors in modern societies. With the rapid advancement and widespread adoption of ICT across different fields, it now plays a significant role in both economic and social development. Recognizing the positive and negative effects of ICT, governments continually strive to propose improved policies and recommendations for enhancing their ICT infrastructure. However, the formulation of effective policies relies on a thorough understanding of past and present policies in order to develop better proposals. To assess ICT development and its impact on society, an integrated social and economic indicators MCDM (Multi-Criteria Decision Making) approach is employed. This approach involves comparing six key indicators: ICT employment, ICT goods exports, ICT investment, ICT value addition, and Internet access. By evaluating the performance of these indicators, a comparison can be made among the G7 countries. Notably, countries like Italy and Canada demonstrate relatively weaker performance in terms of ICT development.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it