MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405884170 · doi:10.5376/mpr.2024.14.0023

Efficient Cultivation Techniques of <i>Corydalis yanhusuo</i> and Strategies to Enhance Alkaloid Content

2024· article· en· W4405884170 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yi Jin, Yongqiang Li, Bowei He

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicinal Plant Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicGABA and Rice Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCorydalisAlkaloidTraditional medicineChemistryMedicineStereochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Corydalis yanhusuo, known as an important medicinal plant, has its tubers widely used in traditional Chinese medicine for their analgesic and anti-inflammatory properties.This study explores the cultivation techniques of Corydalis yanhusuo and strategies to enhance the alkaloid content, its main active component, including soil improvement, environmental control, planting density optimization, and pest and disease management.The study also analyzes the identification of alkaloid biosynthesis genes and their expression patterns during tuber development.The results show that optimizing soil conditions and environmental management can significantly increase tuber yield and alkaloid content.Rational pest and disease control measures, along with biotechnological approaches, hold great potential for enhancing the medicinal components of Corydalis yanhusuo.This study provides a reference for efficient cultivation and enhancement of medicinal value in Corydalis yanhusuo, and offers insights for the cultivation of other medicinal plants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicinal Plant ResearchSame topicGABA and Rice ResearchFrench-language works237,207