Changing of the guards at the Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the first quarter of the 21st century in the books and the first issue of the year of the Journal in front of you, we would like to use this opportunity to wish all our readers, authors and reviewers a happy and healthy New Year. May your wishes, aspirations, and resolutions for 2025 come true. One of the main challenges for the second quarter of the 21st century is the current and upcoming mass retirement of the baby boomer generation that is occurring in many countries, including and in particular in Europe (1). Numerous papers in the Journal have discussed the challenges and possible remedies (2–4). And now, the retirement of the boomers is also happening at SJWEH. As the New Year starts, we are saying goodbye to two Associate Editors as well as one Editor-in-Chief while saying hello to a new one. The Associate Editors – Jens Peter Bonde and Mikko Härmä – are riding off into the sunset after decades-long service to the journal. Mikko has been with the Journal for more 30 years. He is a distinguished scholar in working time research and the effects of working time arrangements on workers’ health, which has evolved as a key topic in occupational health and SJWEH (5). Mikko joined the Journal as an Assistant-Editor-in-Chief in 1994 and became Editor-in-Chief in 2000, when the Journal’s inaugural Editor-in-Chief, Sven Hernberg, retired. For 20 years, Mikko was at the helm and steered the Journal towards its current position as one of the internationally leading occupational health journals. He recently reflected on this process in a presentation on the “changing business of running a scientific journal”, which is available on the Journal’s home page (6). At the end of 2019, Mikko stepped down as Editor-in-Chief, but remained on the Editorial Board as an Associate Editor, a position from which he is now retiring. Jens Peter has served as an Associate Editor since 2010. As an occupational physician and distinguished occupational epidemiologist, he had published extensively on a broad range of topics, including but not limited to reproductive health, cardiovascular disease, musculoskeletal disorders, mental disorders, and, most recently, COVID-19. For a research journal, it is stroke of luck to have a scholar with such a broad expertise on the Editorial Board, who can be assigned to a large proportion of the submitted papers. On a personal level, I would like to add that I am very grateful to Jens Peter for the many discussions we had on the methodological challenges in studying the health effects of psychosocial working conditions. These discussions influenced my research quite a bit. The third retirement is that of Alex (Lex) Burdorf. Lex joined SJWEH as an Associate Editor in 2006 and became Co-Editor-in-Chief at the end of 2018, first together with Mikko Härmä and then with me. As an occupational hygienist and public health researcher, Lex is known for his seminal contributions to exposure assessment methods, musculoskeletal disorders, working-life expectancy and labor market participation, and causal inference debates. Sharing the Editor-in-Chief position with Lex for the past five years has been a privilege. It was educational, effective and, last but not least, a lot of fun. Fortunately for the Journal, Lex will stay on as an Associate Editor. After saying all these goodbyes, we can also say one hello. Join me in welcoming Annina Ropponen, professor at the Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, who has been an Associate Editor at the Journal since 2018, as our new Co-Editor-in-Chief. Annina’s research covers a broad area in occupational health and includes, among other things, research on musculoskeletal disorders, working hours, shift work, remote work, sustainable employment, and sickness absence. I am very happy that Annina agreed to take on this new role and am very much looking forward to working together on the future for the Journal. As we turn the page on this remarkable chapter and embrace the changes ahead, we remain deeply grateful for the invaluable contributions of our retiring editors and are excited to welcome new leadership. With this blend of continuity and fresh perspectives, we are confident that the Journal will continue to thrive as a leading voice in occupational health research. Here’s to building on our legacy and shaping an even brighter future together—thank you for being part of this journey. References 1. European Commision. 2024 Ageing Report. Economic and Budgetary Projections for the EU Member States (2022-2070). Institutional Paper 279. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union; 2024. Available from: https://economy-finance.ec.europa.eu/ecfin-publications_en. (Accessed: 10 December 2024). 2. Andersen LL, Calatayud J, Núñez-Cortés R, Polo-López A, López-Bueno R. Facilitators and barriers for working beyond statutory pension age: A prospective cohort study across 26 European countries. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2024;50(8):622-630. https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.4189 3. van der Mark-Reeuwijk KG, Weggemans RM, Bültmann U, Burdorf A, Deeg DJ, Geuskens GA, et al. Health and prolonging working lives: an advisory report of the Health Council of The Netherlands. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2019;45(5):514-519. https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.3828 4. Hasting RL, Mehlum IS, Undem K, Robroek SJW, Burdorf A, Gran JM, et al. The effects of a national, voluntary agreement for a more inclusive working life on work participation following long-term sickness absence: a Norwegian cohort study. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2023;49(7):466-476. https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.4112 5. Burdorf A, Rugulies R. Fifty years of research in the Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2024;50(1):3-10. https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.4135 6. Härma M. The changing business of running a scientific journal - reflections on the SJWEH. Recording of a presentation held on 4 October 2024. Available from: https://www.sjweh.fi/index.php?page=50y. (Accessed: 10 December 2024).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.014 | 0.028 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.030 | 0.011 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.010 | 0.012 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.036 | 0.017 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".