MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405887669 · doi:10.31083/j.rcm2512457

The Cardiomyocyte in Cirrhosis: Pathogenic Mechanisms Underlying Cirrhotic Cardiomyopathy

2024· review· en· W4405887669 on OpenAlexaff
Dae Gon Ryu, Fengxue Yu, Ki Tae Yoon, Hongqun Liu, Samuel S. Lee

Bibliographic record

VenueReviews in Cardiovascular Medicine · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicTrace Elements in Health
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineCardiomyopathyEndocrinologyMyofilamentCyclic guanosine monophosphateMyocyteHeart failure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cirrhotic cardiomyopathy is defined as systolic and diastolic dysfunction in patients with cirrhosis, in the absence of any primary heart disease. These changes are mainly due to the malfunction or abnormalities of cardiomyocytes. Similar to non-cirrhotic heart failure, cardiomyocytes in cirrhotic cardiomyopathy demonstrate a variety of abnormalities: from the cell membrane to the cytosol and nucleus. At the cell membrane level, biophysical plasma membrane fluidity, and membrane-bound receptors such as the beta-adrenergic, muscarinic and cannabinoid receptors are abnormal either functionally or structurally. Other changes include ion channels such as L-type calcium channels, potassium channels, and sodium transporters. In the cytosol, calcium release and uptake processes are dysfunctional and the myofilaments such as myosin heavy chain and titin, are either functionally abnormal or have structural alterations. Like the fibrotic liver, the heart in cirrhosis also shows fibrotic changes such as a collagen isoform switch from more compliant collagen III to stiffer collagen I which also impacts diastolic function. Other abnormalities include the secondary messenger cyclic adenosine monophosphate, cyclic guanosine monophosphate, and their downstream effectors such as protein kinase A and G-proteins. Finally, other changes such as excessive apoptosis of cardiomyocytes also play a critical role in the pathogenesis of cirrhotic cardiomyopathy. The present review aims to summarize these changes and review their critical role in the pathogenesis of cirrhotic cardiomyopathy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.113
GPT teacher head0.393
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReviews in Cardiovascular MedicineSame topicTrace Elements in HealthFrench-language works237,207