MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Geotourism Potensial on Geoheritage in Natuna Geopark

2024· article· en· W4405888671 on OpenAlexaff
Ryannaldo, K Intan Ratih

Bibliographic record

VenueIOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeotourism and Geoheritage Conservation
Canadian institutionsGovernment of Nunavut
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeoparkGeotourismArchipelagoDiversity (politics)Environmental resource managementGeographyGeologyEarth scienceArchaeologyTourismEnvironmental science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Natuna is an archipelago and the name of a regency located in the Riau Islands Province. Bunguran Island, the largest island, has a unique geological diversity, where the rocks are derived from continental and oceanic crusts, including old river deposits. Natuna is rich in biological and cultural diversity of local communities. The diversity of the Earth’s heritage made Natuna designated as a national geopark in 2018. One of geopark’s goals is to foster a local economic value, which is usually approached through geotourism activities. The purpose of this research is to assess the potential of geotourism, especially from geological heritage aspect. The research method used were literature review, field data sampling, including analysis and classification. It was identified that five geoheritage sites are feasible to be developed into geotourism objects and attractions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.043

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0080.012
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental ScienceSame topicGeotourism and Geoheritage ConservationFrench-language works237,207