Leveraging Self-Training and Variational Autoencoder for Agitation Detection in People with Dementia Using Wearable Sensors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dementia is a neurodegenerative disorder that has been growing among elder people over the past decades. This growth profoundly impacts the quality of life for patients and caregivers due to the symptoms arising from it. Agitation and aggression (AA) are some of the symptoms of people with severe dementia (PwD) in long-term care or hospitals. AA not only causes discomfort but also puts the patients or others at potential risk. Existing monitoring solutions utilizing different wearable sensors integrated with Artificial Intelligence (AI) offer a way to detect AA early enough for timely and adequate medical intervention. However, most studies are limited by the availability of accurately labeled datasets, which significantly affects the efficacy of such solutions in real-world scenarios. This study presents a novel comprehensive approach to detect AA in PwD using physiological data from the Empatica E4 wristbands. The research creates a diverse dataset, consisting of three distinct datasets gathered from 14 participants across multiple hospitals in Canada. These datasets have not been extensively explored due to their limited labeling. We propose a novel approach employing self-training and a variational autoencoder (VAE) to detect AA in PwD effectively. The proposed approach aims to learn the representation of the features extracted using the VAE and then uses a semi-supervised block to generate labels, classify events, and detect AA. We demonstrate that combining Self-Training and Variational Autoencoder mechanism significantly improves model performance in classifying AA in PwD. Among the tested techniques, the XGBoost classifier achieved the highest accuracy of 90.16\%. By effectively addressing the challenge of limited labeled data, the proposed system not only learns new labels but also proves its superiority in detecting AA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".