MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405905366 · doi:10.1093/bib/bbae688

RNA-ModX: a multilabel prediction and interpretation framework for RNA modifications

2024· article· en· W4405905366 on OpenAlexaff
Chelsea Chen Yuge, Ee Soon Hang, Madasamy Ravi Nadar Mamtha, Shashikant Vishwakarma, Sijia Wang, Chengen Wang, Nguyen Quoc Khanh Le

Bibliographic record

VenueBriefings in Bioinformatics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA modifications and cancer
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
FundersNational Science and Technology Council
KeywordsInterpretation (philosophy)RNAComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceComputational biologyNatural language processingBiologyGeneGeneticsProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Accurate prediction of RNA modifications holds profound implications for elucidating RNA function and mechanism, with potential applications in drug development. Here, the RNA-ModX presents a highly precise predictive model designed to forecast post-transcriptional RNA modifications, complemented by a user-friendly web application tailored for seamless utilization by future researchers. To achieve exceptional accuracy, the RNA-ModX systematically explored a range of machine learning models, including Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), Gated Recurrent Unit, and Transformer-based architectures. The model underwent rigorous testing using a dataset comprising RNA sequences containing the four fundamental nucleotides (A, C, G, U) and spanning 12 prevalent modification classes (m6A, m1A, m5C, m5U, m6Am, m7G, Ψ, I, Am, Cm, Gm, and Um), with sequences of length 1001 nucleotides. Notably, the LSTM model, augmented with 3-mer encoding, demonstrated the highest level of model accuracy. Furthermore, Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations were employed to facilitate result interpretation, enhancing the transparency and interpretability of the model's predictions. In conjunction with the model development, a user-friendly web application was meticulously crafted, featuring an intuitive interface for researchers to effortlessly upload RNA sequences. Upon submission, the model executes in the backend, generating predictions which are seamlessly presented to the user in a coherent manner. This integration of cutting-edge predictive modeling with a user-centric interface signifies a significant step forward in facilitating the exploration and utilization of RNA modification prediction technologies by the broader research community.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.909
Threshold uncertainty score0.399

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBriefings in BioinformaticsSame topicRNA modifications and cancerFrench-language works237,207