MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4405905423 · doi:10.4057/jsr.74.397

Structure of Migration from Vietnam to Japan and Migrant Womenʼs Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights

2023· article· en· W4405905423 on OpenAlexaff
Naoko SUNAI

Bibliographic record

VenueJapanese Sociological Review · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicVietnamese History and Culture Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReproductive healthMigrant workersGender studiesReproductive rightsSociologyDemographic economicsSocioeconomicsPolitical scienceDemographyEconomic growthPopulationEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

本稿は,ベトナム出身の技能実習経験者への質的調査をもとに,移住の構造と移民の「性と生殖に関する健康と権利(sexual and reproductive health and rights: SRHR)」の関係を明らかにする.その上で,国家と移住産業,労働市場が関与する移住の構造自体が移住女性の SRHR を剝奪し,技能実習の在留資格をもつ移住女性を非人間化/人種化すること,さらに SRHR の制度的・構造的剝奪状況が妊娠・出産関連の危険に女性と子どもをさらすことを議論する.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.069
Threshold uncertainty score0.136

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJapanese Sociological Review→Same topicVietnamese History and Culture Studies→French-language works237,207→