MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Sum Rate Maximization for RIS-assisted UAV-IoT Networks using Sample Efficient SAC Technique

2024· article· en· W4405908695 on OpenAlexaff
Bhagawat Adhikari, Ahmed Shaharyar Khwaja, Muhammad Jaseemuddin, Alagan Anpalagan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUAV Applications and Optimization
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaximizationComputer scienceSample (material)Internet of ThingsReal-time computingMathematical optimizationMathematicsEmbedded systemChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) based algorithms have been widely adopted to solve the non-convex optimization problems in Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface (RIS)assisted Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) systems for establishing uninterrupted wireless connections with the ground Internet of Things (IoT) devices. However, model-free DRL techniques such as Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient (DDPG), Deep Q-learning (DQN) and Double Deep Q-learning (DDQN) suffer from low convergence and poor sample efficiency. Use of off-policy DRL techniques can be an appropriate solution to enhance the sample efficiency and training speed in vulnerable and fast changing environments involving multiple IoTs. In this paper, we use a novel off-policy actor-critic DRL technique called Soft ActorCritic (SAC) to solve the sum rate maximization problem in RIS-assisted UAV-IoT networks in dense urban environment. We perform simulations to compare the results of the proposed sample efficient SAC algorithm with the existing DDPG technique with and without RIS optimization. Our simulations show that SAC with optimized RIS outperforms the model-free DDPG technique in terms of maximizing the sum rate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.647
Threshold uncertainty score0.455

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicUAV Applications and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207