MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Deep Reinforcement Learning based Model-Free Wide-Area Damping Control under Uncertain Delays

2024· article· en· W4405908983 on OpenAlexaff
Qingyang Li, Shichao Liu, Hicham Chaoui

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicPower Systems and Renewable Energy
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReinforcement learningComputer scienceReinforcementControl theory (sociology)Control (management)Artificial intelligenceEngineeringStructural engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although inter-area signals measured by PMU provides more robust control to mitigate the oscillations occurring at lower frequencies, controlling techniques relying on wide-area signals encounter considerable obstacles posed by transmission delays over longer communication channels stretching from PMUs to wide-area damping control (WADC) systems. Managing fluctuating transmission delays is crucial, particularly within expansive monitoring and control systems. Without any knowledge of the real-time transmission delays at every sample time, this paper presents pioneering method employing Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) for WADC, devoid of traditional modeling, to effectively mitigate inter-area low-frequency oscillations. The state set includes both cyber layer information and physical layer power system performance. The optimal control policy is designed by deep determinisitic policy gradient (DDPG) to maximize the reward function on every sample time. The reward function is designed based on the working features of the generators for enabling timely damping oscillations. The IEEE 10-Generator 39-Bus system serves as the focal point for comparative analyses conducted in this study using the proposed model-free DDPG based WADC with the proposed state set and with conventional state set. The results show that based on the proposed state set, DRL agent can get enough information of the environment. The trained optimal control policy can be continuously updated by DDPG agent with a maximum reward value. With the proposed state set, the ddpg based WADC system exemplifies the rapid suppression of inter-area low-frequency oscillations and the dependable stabilization of the power system, even when faced with uncertain time delays.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.960
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPower Systems and Renewable EnergyFrench-language works237,207