MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Developing “Capture the Flag” for 5G IoT Cyber Security Training

2024· article· en· W4405909055 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicInternet of Things and AI
Canadian institutionsTelus (Canada)Algonquin College
FundersScience and Engineering Research CouncilMitacs
KeywordsFlag (linear algebra)Internet of ThingsComputer scienceComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fifth Generation cellular data systems (5G) are critical infrastructure that deliver IoT, mobile, and broadband services. They have high security demands and complex architectures. Despite the importance of these systems, there is relatively little hands-on training available for 5G engineers and security practitioners. To address this gap, this paper explores the development and implementation of a 5 G network training environment in the form of a Capture the Flag game, wherein teams compete to solve 5G hacking challenges on virtual 5G infrastructure. Our system includes open sourc 5G components, an open source Capture the Flag game engine, and a new game mechanism to facilitate packet-injection challenges against both external and internal interfaces of the 5G system. We outline the design of the system and present progress towards developing 5 G challenges aligned to the MITRE FiGHT threat framework.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.934
Threshold uncertainty score0.502

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicInternet of Things and AIFrench-language works237,207