MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

UAV-Enabled Uplink in Massive IoT Networks with Circular and Spiral Trajectory Designs

2024· article· en· W4405909237 on OpenAlexaff
Yindi Jing, Xinwei Yu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUAV Applications and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTelecommunications linkTrajectorySpiral (railway)Computer scienceInternet of ThingsComputer networkEmbedded systemEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work is on the uplink of a massive Internet-of-Things (IoT) network where an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) base station (BS) receives signals from ground users independently and uniformly distributed in a disk region. Aiming at low complexity schemes and analytical results, we consider the circular and spiral UAV trajectories. For the circular trajectory, we propose a low-complexity angle-based user scheduling scheme and show that it achieves the optimal asymptotic user rate as the number of users grows to infinity. A closed-form expression of the optimal asymptotic user rate is also derived. Further, an analytical Archimedean spiral trajectory model is proposed, and a low-complexity group-and-match user scheduling scheme is developed. Numerical evidence is provided for the proposed scheduling schemes and derivations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.912
Threshold uncertainty score0.266

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicUAV Applications and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207