MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

SDN-Based Service Function Chaining in Kubernetes Using Network Service Mesh with Kernel-type Network Interfaces for Industrial IoT

2024· article· en· W4405909239 on OpenAlexaff
Amir Hoseein Ghorab, Mohammed Abuibaid, AYSUN ASLAN SARUHAN, Marc St‐Hilaire

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5G
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChainingComputer scienceComputer networkKernel (algebra)Internet of ThingsService (business)Function (biology)Distributed computingEmbedded system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The increasing adoption of Virtual Network Functions (VNFs) and Kubernetes for Industrial IoT applications has sparked interest in Service Function Chaining (SFC) deployment within Kubernetes environments. However, deploying SFC in Kubernetes requires a flexible and manageable network infrastructure, which Kubernetes alone cannot provide. Network Service Mesh (NSM) has emerged as a popular solution by offering layer 2 and 3 service mesh capabilities with various features tailored for Kubernetes clusters. Despite NSM’s support for SFC, it needs to meet the requirements for industrial IoT use cases due to its lack of integration with Software-Defined Networking (SDN) controllers and its incapacity to provide Kernel-type network interfaces for Network Function (NF) pods. This paper proposes a solution to address these limitations by integrating NSM with an SDN controller and enabling Kernel-type interfaces for NF pods. Our experimental results demonstrate that while the NSM-based solution is overshadowed by OvS-based SFC deployment regarding maximum throughput, latency, and packet loss, it offers valuable features such as ease of use and elimination of manual configuration requirements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.702
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5GFrench-language works237,207