MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405911438 · doi:10.1093/jbmrpl/ziae176

Understanding the structural biology of osteomalacia through multiscale 3D X-ray and electron tomographic imaging: a review of X-linked hypophosphatemia, the <i>Hyp</i> mouse model, and imaging methods

2024· review· en· W4405911438 on OpenAlexafffund
Daniel J. Buss, Joseph Deering, Natalie Reznikov, Marc D. McKee

Bibliographic record

VenueJBMR Plus · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAlkaline Phosphatase Research Studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMcGill University Health Centre
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research ChairsMcGill University
KeywordsPHEXOsteomalaciaExtracellular matrixHypophosphatemiaChemistryMineralized tissuesOsteopontinBiophysicsCell biologyPathologyBiochemistryBiologyMedicineOsteoporosisEndocrinologyRicketsDentinVitamin D and neurology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Biomineralization in bones and teeth is a highly regulated extracellular event. In the skeleton, mineralization at the tissue level is controlled within the collagenous extracellular matrix by both circulating and local factors. While systemic regulation of mineral ion homeostasis has been well-studied over many decades, much less is known about the regulation of mineralization at the local level directly within the extracellular matrix. Some local regulators have been identified, such as tissue-nonspecific alkaline phosphatase (TNAP), phosphate-regulating endopeptidase homolog X-linked (PHEX), pyrophosphate, and osteopontin, and others are currently under investigation. Dysregulation of the actions of enzyme-inhibitor substrate pairs engaged in mineralization (as we describe by the Stenciling Principle for extracellular matrix mineralization) leads to osteomalacic “soft bone” diseases, such as hypophosphatasia (HPP) and X-linked hypophosphatemia (XLH). This review addresses how advances in 3D imaging tools and software now allow contextual and correlative viewing and interpretation of mineralized tissue structure across most length scales. Contextualized and integrated 3D multiscale data obtained from these imaging modalities have afforded an unprecedented structural biology view of bone from the macroscale to the nanoscale. Such correlated volume imaging data is highly quantitative, providing not only an integrated view of the skeleton in health, but also a means to observe alterations that occur in disease. In the context of the many hierarchical levels of skeletal organization, here we summarize structural features of bone over multiple length scales, with a focus on nano- and microscale features as viewed by X-ray and electron tomography imaging methods (submicron μCT and FIB-SEM). We additionally summarize structural changes observed after dysregulation of the mineralization pathway, focusing here on the Hyp mouse model for XLH. More specifically, we summarize how mineral patterns/packs at the microscale (3D crossfibrillar mineral tessellation), and how this is defective in Hyp mouse bone and Hyp enthesis fibrocartilage.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.111
GPT teacher head0.448
Teacher spread0.338 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJBMR PlusSame topicAlkaline Phosphatase Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207