MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405913495 · doi:10.31083/j.rcm2512463

An Artificial Intelligence-Based Non-Invasive Approach for Cardiovascular Disease Risk Stratification in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Patients: A Narrative Review

2024· review· en· W4405913495 on OpenAlexaff
Luca Saba, Mahesh Maindarkar, Narendra N. Khanna, Anudeep Puvvula, Gavino Faa, Esma R. Isenović, Amer M. Johri, Mostafa M. Fouda, Ekta Tiwari, Manudeep K. Kalra, Jasjit S. Suri

Bibliographic record

VenueReviews in Cardiovascular Medicine · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicObstructive Sleep Apnea Research
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRisk stratificationObstructive sleep apneaSleep apneaIntensive care medicineDiseaseCardiologyNarrative reviewInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a severe condition associated with numerous cardiovascular complications, including heart failure. The complex biological and morphological relationship between OSA and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) poses challenges in predicting adverse cardiovascular outcomes. While artificial intelligence (AI) has shown potential for predicting cardiovascular disease (CVD) and stroke risks in other conditions, there is a lack of detailed, bias-free, and compressed AI models for ASCVD and stroke risk stratification in OSA patients. This study aimed to address this gap by proposing three hypotheses: (i) a strong relationship exists between OSA and ASCVD/stroke, (ii) deep learning (DL) can stratify ASCVD/stroke risk in OSA patients using surrogate carotid imaging, and (iii) including OSA risk as a covariate with cardiovascular risk factors can improve CVD risk stratification. Methods: The study employed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) search strategy, yielding 191 studies that link OSA with coronary, carotid, and aortic atherosclerotic vascular diseases. This research investigated the link between OSA and CVD, explored DL solutions for OSA detection, and examined the role of DL in utilizing carotid surrogate biomarkers by saving costs. Lastly, we benchmark our strategy against previous studies. Results: (i) This study found that CVD and OSA are indirectly or directly related. (ii) DL models demonstrated significant potential in improving OSA detection and proved effective in CVD risk stratification using carotid ultrasound as a biomarker. (iii) Additionally, DL was shown to be useful for CVD risk stratification in OSA patients; (iv) There are important AI attributes such as AI-bias, AI-explainability, AI-pruning, and AI-cloud, which play an important role in CVD risk for OSA patients. Conclusions: DL provides a powerful tool for CVD risk stratification in OSA patients. These results can promote several recommendations for developing unique, bias-free, and explainable AI algorithms for predicting ASCVD and stroke risks in patients with OSA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.004
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.372
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReviews in Cardiovascular MedicineSame topicObstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchFrench-language works237,207