MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405917760 · doi:10.1080/03610926.2024.2437517

Complete convergence for <i>m</i> -widely acceptable random variables under sub-linear expectations

2024· article· en· W4405917760 on OpenAlexaff
Hui Wang, Wei Wang, Yi Wu

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunication in Statistics- Theory and Methods · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicProbability and Risk Models
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
FundersScience and Technology Support Plan for Youth Innovation of Colleges and Universities of Shandong Province of China
KeywordsConvergence (economics)Random variableMathematicsProofs of convergence of random variablesWork (physics)Space (punctuation)Applied mathematicsConvergence of random variablesStatisticsComputer scienceSum of normally distributed random variablesEngineeringEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

.In this work, we study the complete convergence for arrays of rowwise m-widely acceptable random variables under sub-linear expectations. Some general results are established, which extend and improve some existing ones in sub-linear expectation space.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.020
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.269
Threshold uncertainty score0.955

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0200.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.203
GPT teacher head0.506
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCommunication in Statistics- Theory and MethodsSame topicProbability and Risk ModelsFrench-language works237,207