Michael Meaney: What is the biology that underlies the gene x environment interdependence that shapes brain health?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As a distinguished James McGill Professor and now Professor Emeritus at McGill University, Michael Meaney's scientific journey is a testament to the power of curiosity in science. His fascination with how our environment shapes our genes, brain function, and mental health has led to discoveries that have changed how we think about human development. After leading groundbreaking research at McGill, he took his expertise to Singapore, where, as Director of the Translational Neuroscience program at ASTAR, he helped shape the innovative GUSTO birth cohort study. His profound impact on neuroscience is reflected not just in his impressive collection of honors – from the Order of Canada to his recent election to the American Academy of Arts and Sciences – but in how his work has touched lives. With over 650 publications to his name, Meaney has helped bridge the gap between molecular biology and public health. We are fortunate to have him share his insights with our readers in this Genomic Press Interview.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".