MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405929610 · doi:10.1627/jpi.68.20

Application of the Gray Level Co-occurrence Matrix (GLCM) Technique for Analyzing Fracture Networks in the Granitic Basement of Cuu Long Basin, Vietnam

2024· article· en· W4405929610 on OpenAlexaff
Azer Mustaqeem, Valentina Baranova, Nguyen Binh Kieu, Văn Xuân Trần, Xuan Kha Nguyen, Quoc Thanh Truong, Bao Phung GIA

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Japan Petroleum Institute · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Canadian institutionsPetro-Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyStructural basinGeochemistryCo-occurrence matrixMatrix (chemical analysis)Fracture (geology)BasementSeismologyGray levelGray (unit)MineralogyGeomorphologyGeotechnical engineeringMaterials scienceComposite materialGeographyArchaeologyArtificial intelligenceImage (mathematics)Computer scienceImage processing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Cuu Long Basin (CLB) in offshore Vietnam is a key hydrocarbon-producing region, known for its complex geological structures, particularly in the basement granite. However, traditional seismic methods often struggle to accurately map faults and fractures within the basement granite, largely due to the lack of distinct geological layering. To overcome this challenge, this study proposes the application of the gray level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) technique to analyze the texture of geological features, such as faults and fractures, within the basement granite of the CLB. By applying the GLCM method, the study aims to detect basement faults, identify lineaments, and examine the compartmentalization of basement reservoirs. The results demonstrate that the GLCM analysis reveals zones with shallow-deep fault interactions have lower prospectivity compared to areas where older faults do not extend upwards. Additionally, the GLCM attributes show a correlation with the FMI (Formation Micro Imager) data, assisting in the identification of additional oil reserves. GLCM analysis reveals that zones with interactions between shallow and deep faults show lower prospectivity compared to areas where older faults remain confined to deeper levels in the basement granite of the CLB. These findings underscore the potential of GLCM as a valuable tool for enhancing fault detection and reservoir characterization in complex geological settings like the CLB.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.787
Threshold uncertainty score0.245

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Japan Petroleum InstituteSame topicSeismic Imaging and Inversion TechniquesFrench-language works237,207