MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405933076 · doi:10.32388/elopqs

Review of: "When the Mind Falters: Managing CEO Cognitive Decline in Leadership"

2024· peer-review· en· W4405933076 on OpenAlexaff
Amir A. Sepehry

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepeer-review
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicEmotional Intelligence and Performance
Canadian institutionsAdler
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyCognitionBusinessSocial psychologyPublic relationsPolitical scienceNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

I have read this review manuscript on CEO and cognitive decline with interest.It has signi cant implications in global management (e.g., president, prime minister), but it fails to deliver given the signi cant methodological aws.I understand that large corporations and governments use and have a plan if the president or the CEO cannot optimally perform (e.g., Interim president, 60-day rule, president by election, order of succession).Similarly to driving capacity assessment, CEOs can be subjected to annual neurocognitive evaluation after a certain age, which can be mandated and noted in corporate policy without being unethical and inviting transparency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.309
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0390.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.259
GPT teacher head0.452
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEmotional Intelligence and PerformanceFrench-language works237,207