MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4405933908 · doi:10.1109/tase.2024.3521332

Data-Driven Iterative Learning Temperature Control for Rubber Mixing Processes

2024· article· en· W4405933908 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced materials and composites
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersYouth Innovation Team Project for Talent Introduction and Cultivation in Universities of Shandong ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsIterative learning controlMixing (physics)Natural rubberControl (management)Computer scienceTemperature controlIterative methodMaterials scienceControl theory (sociology)Control engineeringArtificial intelligenceEngineeringAlgorithmPhysicsComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Considering the four challenges of non-identical initial states, non-repetitive uncertainties, different batch lengths, and unavailable mathematical model of a rubber mixing process (RMP), this article proposes a data-driven iterative learning temperature control (DDILTC) for the RMP. Specifically, an iterative linear data model (iLDM) is developed to formulate the iterative dynamics of RMP and is further used as a one-step iterative linear predictive model to estimate the RMP’s temperature that is unavailable when the current batch length is shorter than the desired one. The unknown parameters of the iLDM are estimated iteratively by designing an iterative adaption law. Further, an iterative learning based observer is designed to estimate the non-repetitive uncertainties and non-identical initial states as an extended state. The proposed DDILTC is a data-driven method and the iLDM is only used to formulate the iterative relationship of the input-output between two batches instead of a mathematical model of the RMP with physical meanings. Simulation study verifies the results. Note to Practitioners—The mixing temperature of a rubber mixing process (RMP) is a critical variable, ensuring the desired plasticity and viscosity of the rubber compounds. Indeed, RMP is a typical batch process performing repetitively over the finite time interval. However, no ILC results about the RMP temperature control have been reported even though ILC can learn the control experience from the past batches to improve control performance. The main reason lies in that the practical environments of RMP make it impossible to satisfy the strictly repetitive conditions, i.e., the initial states, disturbances, and batch lengths are all iteration-varying. Furthermore, it is difficult to establish a mathematical model of the RMP due to its large production scale and complex dynamics along both time and iteration directions. Therefore, the main motivation of this paper is to study the iterative learning temperature control problem of RMP by considering the nonrepetitive uncertainties of initial states, disturbances, and batch lengths, bypassing the use of any model information. An iterative linear data model (iLDM) is established to equivalently reformulate the unavailable two-dimensional dynamic behavior of RMP and to facilitate the controller design and analysis. The gradient uncertainty of RMP is reformulated as the unknown parameters in the iLDM and can be iteratively estimated by designing an iterative adaptation algorithm. The non-repetitive initial states and disturbances can be estimated by designing an iterative observer. Moreover, the unavailable mixing temperatures at the unreachable operation points are estimated by using the iLDM as the iterative predictive model. To summarize, the proposed method is simple in computation and easy in implementation since only the I/O data is used, and thus it is of great practical significance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.912
Threshold uncertainty score0.436

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it