Mechanisms of State-Legal Management of Human Capital Development and Sustainable Development
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In modern conditions, the development of human capital is one of the main components of a long-term strategy of development for any country, in connection with which finding opportunities for the formation of mechanisms of state-legal management is relevant. The aim of this research was to assess what approaches can be used in Azerbaijan to increase the rate of human capital development in the country. The main methods used in the research were logico-legal and the method of legal hermeneutics. The interdisciplinary approach connected human capital development with broader sustainability goals, emphasizing the critical role of skilled human resources in addressing complex challenges like climate change, technological innovation, and economic diversification. Within the framework of the research, it was assessed certain indicators that characterize the peculiarities of the current state of human capital in the country. During the work, the role of governmental mechanisms in the processes of human capital management in the country was assessed. In addition, the situation related to the development of this component in Azerbaijan was assessed. It was shown that the situation in this area in the country is generally improving, but some problems still remain and continue to negatively influence on the situation. It was concluded that most of the main changes, namely social characteristics and economic development of the country, have strongly positive trends. Nevertheless, the level of education and science in the country is developing insufficiently. The study assessed the main problems that currently exist in the field of education, as well as proposed specific methods for their solution. Among the problems were: corruption; inadequate education; low number of pupils in pre-school and higher education; low pay for teachers. Using the methods proposed in the research, the government of Azerbaijan will be able to achieve significant results in improving this situation, which can be one of the catalysts for improving both the social well-being of the country and the level of economic development.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".